موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد فاخر

Kazem Farmani
Kazem was a pleasant candidate and a controlled speaker who was able to self-correct himself throughout the interview.  He often needed prompting to gain further information and when asked to describe a book he struggled due to his limited range of vocabulary. He should now concentrate on this area further to gain a better mark next time.

Eisa Folai
 Eisa gave some excellent responses that were always of a good length for this level. He demonstrated a good grasp of English as he was able to use appropriate language for each question and used some useful expressions too, such as, as a matter of fact. Eisa made little grammatical errors, but he tended to repeat the words from the question, so he should try to paraphrase more.

Marjan AleMansour
 Marjanwas another student who gave detailed answers and tried to use various scenarios to support her responses. She also used conditional structures well and was able to speak at a steady speed with few pauses in between here sentences. However, she made a couple of errors with the correct tense because she tended to use the past simple when it should have been the present perfect.  Finally, I believe Marjan now needs to start using opening expressions in her responses to gain a better grade in the future.

Masomeh PourTalebi
Masomeh was a clear speaker was able to comprehend the majority of questions. Having said this, he normally had to be asked additional question in order to get a fuller response and, at times, he was unable to do this because his vocabulary was quite limited. This was evident when as to give a reason why he liked something because his response would often be ‘because I like it’. So he most definitely needs to work on this area further.

Laila ShakibaPour
Laila had a good pronunciation of words and was able to use descriptive language well. When asked to talk about a recent book she has read, she was able to talk at length about the book, ‘A Time to Kill’. However, Laila had to have her questions repeated several times and when giving a response she would list her ideas/reasons rather than using linkers to join them together. Furthermore, used the past simple tense instead of the present perfect,  so she would benefit from reviewing the grammatical rules again.

Amineh Nemati
Aminehcould understand complex questions well and gave examples to support her answers. In addition, she attempted to answer all questions when she was not always 100% sure of what was being asked. However, Amineh had some issues with prepositions on several occasions and also used incorrect verbs at times, for example, ‘I see at the radio’.

Milad Shafie
Milad was a controlled speaker who demonstrated a good understanding of word order. Though when he gave his answers, he was not able to expand on them and he exhibited a rather limited range of vocabulary. This, in turn, had an effect on the degree of complexity in his responses.

Kobra Karami
Kobra gave a very good introduction and had a good range of expressions, such as, ‘Yes, I absolutely agree’. Furthermore, she gave detailed answers and use appropriate language too. There were some grammar mistakes, like, prepositional errors and verb forms with uncountable nouns, but with a little more effort I am sure she will be able to iron these out.

Sahar Bostani
Saharhad some good ideas in her answers and had good pronunciation skills. However, she tended to pause for long periods in the middle of her sentences and to think about her answers which resulted in a less fluid response. Also, Sahar should look at expanding her vocabulary and using linkers to join her ideas together.

Behzad Sadeghi
Behzad used some good opening phrases to begin his responses and was able to use appropriate language to emphasis his points. There were a few times when he used an incorrect preposition, e.g. ‘In my last vacation’ instead of ‘on’, and he repeatedly used ‘also’ to give additional information. Therefore, Behzad would benefit from using more synonyms to reduce this from happening next time.

Shokofeh Zare
Shokofeh had little difficultly in understanding each question and this was evident in the responses given. She also used some good sentence structures and used language which related directly to the questions. Shokofeh should now think about varying the type of linker used because there were some occasions where she repeated ‘and’ rather than an alternative.

Golanar Lashkari
Golanar was a confident speaker of English and used some quite advanced language. There were some issues with her grammar, such as, making third person mistakes and giving incomplete conditionals, but these are small errors so she should not have any difficulties correcting them.
Navid Rahimi
Navid was able to personalise his responses well and used personal examples to back up what he was saying. Also, he has a good grasp of English as he used excellent phrases, like, ‘honk their horn’. There were the odd one or two mistakes with the passive form, e.g. ‘when the computer invented’, but all in all a good effort.

Abas Jafarzadeh
Abas was another confident speaker with some good ideas and expressions, which he could link together correctly. Furthermore, his intonation and stress was of a good standard and this made him easier to follow. He should try and work on the usage of the definite and indefinite articles as he often got these mixed up.