موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد فاخر

Hamed Hashemi

Hamed was a clear speaker and was able to give full answers to each question. Also, he demonstrated a good range of vocabulary and expressions, such as, ‘I’m a real fan of…’. There were a couple of irrelevant answers due to him he misunderstanding the question and he made a couple of errors with verb forms e.g. ‘ate’ instead of ‘eat’.

Mohsen Kargar

 Mohsen pronounced words correctly by using accurate intonation and stress. She also self-corrected herself and used a good range of vocabulary. However, there were some third person errors and in a question relating to her family she listed what she had rather than using linkers to join them, so she should try to use ‘and’ and ‘also’ more to improve her fluency.

SoheilaDabiri

Soheila gave full responses and could competently form sentences which contained appropriate vocabulary. She had a few difficulties with pronouns at times, as she said ‘my sister and me’ instead of ‘my sister and I’, and she also made a couple of pronunciation errors. Having said this, they were only minimal mistakes, so all in all a good attempt.

Parvin Basatandaz

Parvin was a pleasant candidate who spoke clearly and gave a detailed description of her family. She also revealed some good ideas, but often gave long pauses in between her answers which resulted in a less fluid response. Furthermore, Parvin struggled to answer a couple of questions because she did not fully understand them, thus she should expand her lexis more.

Sara Rouzitalab

Sara gave a large amount of detail in her answers and tried to expand as much as she possibly could. Also, she was able to use a wide variety of words, such as, ‘clogged sink’. Having said this, there were several occasions when the word order was muddled, so she should work on this further to up her overall grade.

Mohhamademin Pirani

Mohhamademin spoke at a steady speed and had some good thoughts, but he often had to be prompted multiple times and even then his answers were still quite limited. This could be due to a limited vocabulary so he should develop this area more. Also, Mohhamademin made a lot of errors with word order, thus he ought to work on this too.

Amir Emad

Amir was able to give some interesting ideas relating to small and large families, but with questions he was not as confident about he struggled to give a fuller reply. In addition to this, he would tend to pause partway through an answer, and he listed information instead of using complete sentences.

Amin Nasimi

Amin was a polite and well-spoken candidate who listened intently to each question. However, he was not able to give accurate answers and rarely used completed simple sentence structures, as he often gave a list of ideas.

Shahriyar Khosravi

Shahriyar was able to give detailed replies to each question asked and spoke at a good pace. Also, she used some quite complex language and used conditionals correctly throughout.  There were very few mistakes, those mainly dealt with third person errors e.g. ‘it make me fat’, so she should be extra careful with this.

Zahra Mesbah

i Zahra used some excellent opening expressions and phrases in her answers, such as, ‘I think’ and ‘I’m really into’. Furthermore, she gave full responses, when possible, and had good pronunciation skills. However, there were some slight errors with articles as they tended to be left out of her sentences.

Shoayb Langavi

Shoayb used some brilliant phrases in her responses to guide the listener and demonstrated a good level of vocabulary. However, at times, she struggled with a couple of questions and had to have a couple of them rephrased to aid this.

Mohammadreza Kahtari

Mohammadreza gave a very good introduction in relation to his family and he was also able to give full responses to the questions asked, although on the odd occasion I had to ask him ‘why’ to gain more information out of him. Also, he made a few errors with plural and singular form verbs, so he should check these again.

Mohammad Ali Kahtari

Mohammad was a pleasant student who spoke at a good pace and he attempted to answers those questions he could understand. He did find some of them quite difficult and this resulted in him either giving very short responses or having to be encouraged to give more details. Furthermore, he did not use auxiliary verbs when he need to.

Zahra Mohseni

Zahra had good listening skills as she was able to comprehend the majority of questions the first time she was asked and did not need them repeating. However, she had to be asked ‘why’ on several occasions to gain further information from her and there were slight third person errors, such as ‘The window don’t open’.

Ahmad RezaSelahi

Ahmad gave a very detailed description of his family and used good descriptive words when doing so. Also, he tried to give a response to all the questions, even if he was not 100% sure of their meaning. Unfortunately, Ahmad struggled with the word order, for example, ‘make my life computer better’. Furthermore, he did not use auxiliary verbs in his sentences, thus he should study these more.

Fatemeh Sahami

Fatemeh was a clear speaker with good pronunciation of words. She had some good ideas, but sadly, she did not use linkers to join them together well. Also, she needs to expand on her answer more as I had to prompt Fatemeh throughout.

Mahboube Mohamadi

Mahboube was a confident speaker whospoke at a good speed throughout, resulting in her being easy to follow.  Also,she used appropriate opening phrases to begin her replies. Having said this, Mahboube made some plural form mistakes as she missed the ‘s’ off certain plural words like ‘2 brother and 2 sister’.

Amir Jafar

Amir was easy to follow, due to his fluency, and was able to expand on his answer well, using adequate vocabulary to do so.  In addition to these, he used excellent opening phrases and emphasised his responses with appropriate language. There were a couple of minor errors, one being that he did not use the correct verb form as he said ‘is more advantages’ not ‘are more advantages’.

Mahnaz Haghnegahdar

Mahnaz was a confident speaker who demonstrated a wide range of vocabulary. Also, she was able to give excellent personalised examples to support her answers and used both modal verbs and phrasal verbs correctly. However, she made a couple of mistakes in her responses as she confused some object pronouns e.g. ‘both of them’ instead of ‘both of us’.