موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد فاخر

Maryam Farhad

Maryam could form simple sentences and was able to use the present tense well. Also, she could support her replies with personal examples. There were a lot of occasions when she did not understand the questions fully as she often responded with an irrelevant answer. Furthermore, she was not unable to use the past tense when she really should have. Having said this, there were a few issues with the connection and this may have affected the quality of her speaking.

Laila Safari

Laila was able to self correct herself on numerous instances and she had some good ideas. Also, she demonstrated a good range of vocabulary, but she could not use many words in the correct form. I would advise Laila to try and work on her word order as these were a major problem too e.g.  ‘I very like this much’.

Negin Azizi

Negin gave a detailed introduction and had good intonation. In addition, she could comprehend the majority of question on her first hear. However, she misheard some of the questions which meant that her answer did not match the question and sometimes she would miss out possessive pronouns.

Shahin Shahriyari

Shahin was able to name a lot of useful information and she especially gave a lot of at the start when she could speaker more freely about herself. Having said this, there were some issues in her answers as she often listed ideas rather than joining them together with linkers. Also, she missed out certain verbs, for example ‘I want teacher’, and she made a few pronunciation errors.

Sahar Haghighat

Sahar spoke clearly at an excellent pace and rarely struggled with understanding the questions. Also, she gave full responses and only needed to be prompted once for more detail. She should work on using synonyms more because she would often say the same verb rather than replacing it with a different one.

Zahra Rezaei

Zahra was a confident speaker and gave an in-depth description of her life. Having said this, she missed out pronouns and articles in her answers and she often had difficulties with understanding the questions which resulted in incorrect replies.

Shahrzad Rasekh

Shahrzad was a clear speaker and could understand more complex structures. Furthermore, she used a lot of useful vocabulary and did not need to be assisted with any questions which resulted in an interview which flowed well. She sometimes repeated the same verbs, so should work on using phrasal verbs more as this will only enhance her English speaking ability.

Saharnaz Sepehr

Saharnaz gave extremely detailed responses and used appropriate phrases to begin them. Also, she could use excellent examples to support her ideas and did not need prompting. There were just one or two issues, one being that she used the adjective form instead of the noun form, for example, ‘I would like to go to american’.

Mandana Rasekh

Mandana had very good pronunciation and used suitable vocabulary. Also, she used descriptive language well because she described her old teacher well. She should be careful with some of his choice of words because, at times, he confused certain words, like ’25 years ago’ instead of ‘old’ and ‘he learned me a lot of things’. Also, he should pay extra attention to frequency adverbs as these were placed at the end of a sentence.

Shahrokh Shojaei

Shahrokh came across as a confident speaker and he could give much fuller responses than expected. He also used a wide range of vocabulary and phrases, and if he was unsure of a meaning, he would double check it before answering, as he did with ‘spare time’. However, he tended to say ‘erm’ quite a bit throughout his interview, so he should try to reduce this in the future.

Bahareh Masoudi

Bahareh spoke at a good pace and was able to reproduce the correct pronunciation of words. She did however, struggle with a lot of the questions as she gave an incorrect reply  so she should work on her listening more. Also, Bahareh needs to concentrate on the order of words because this again let her down. One example of this is, ‘I visit at weekend once a week’.

Somayeh Foroghiniya

Although Somayeh gave a brief introduction, she was able to use simple sentences well. Also, she used appropriate language in her answers, but she had to be asked further questions in order to gain more information. Furthermore, Somayeh should be careful when forming the verb to be as she often got these mixed up.

BahmanRohani Bahman spoke at a reasonable speed and stressed words correctly. He also used comparative adjectives and the past tense correctly. Having said this, Bahman needs to focus more on how to extend his replies, as he always had to be prompted to gain additional information, and he should be careful with his verbs that are followed by ‘to’.

Khobchehr Asadi

Khobchehr used some useful vocabulary in her answers, especially weather vocabulary, and used descriptive language well. Also, she accurately used adverbs and began her responses with suitable expressions. On the other hand, Khobchehr needs to work on her grammar more because there were several occasions when the wrong tense was applied, such as, ‘I study in Fakher now’, also, she tended to place the adjective after the noun.

ParisaEslamlo

Parisa gave a detailed description about her family and used good phrase to express her liking for something, e.g. ‘I’m crazy about…’. Though she needed a great deal of questions repeated or rephrased and at one point replied in Persian, so she should work on her listening for next time.

Kaveh Eslamlo

Kaveh was a polite candidate who was able to self correct and form sentences well with all the words in the correct order. However, he often had to be prompted to gain further knowledge and he struggled with the present perfect tense.

Marziyeh Shahani

Marziyeh was able to talk in the present tense well and made some valid points in her answers. Although she had some good ideas, she generally listed them instead of linking them together with connectors. Also, Marziyeh should work on her listening further because she often misunderstood questions and this resulted in an irrelevant answer being given.

Sara Mohamadi

Sara gave an excellent introduction on her background and has an excellent awareness of her pronunciation because if she pronounced a word incorrectly, she swiftly corrected it. She needs to work on her prepositions as she would leave these o, such as, ‘When I was high school …’. Also at times, Sara gave quite brief replies, so she should ways to extend them.

Mostafa Golchin

Mostafa pronounced words well and he demonstrated a good understanding of present simple questions. Having said this, he needs to work on extending his answer much more because he regularly answered with yes/no short answers. This made it much harder to assess and he did not use a wide range of vocabulary. Also, when he was asked slightly harder questions, he would reply with a completely different answer so he should work at enhancing his listening skills.

Ehsan Mansorabadi

Ehsan could form sentences with third person verbs in it correctly throughout and he used good descriptive language when talking about his family. He made some word order errors, one being, ‘my teacher favourite Mr W… at school’; and tended to miss articles with singular nouns.

Maryam Farhad

Maryam could form simple sentences and was able to use the present tense well. Also, she could support her replies with personal examples. There were a lot of occasions when she did not understand the questions fully as she often responded with an irrelevant answer. Furthermore, she was not unable to use the past tense when she really should have. Having said this, there were a few issues with the connection and this may have affected the quality of her speaking.

Laila Safari

Laila was able to self correct herself on numerous instances and she had some good ideas. Also, she demonstrated a good range of vocabulary, but she could not use many words in the correct form. I would advise Laila to try and work on her word order as these were a major problem too e.g.  ‘I very like this much’.

Negin Azizi

Negin gave a detailed introduction and had good intonation. In addition, she could comprehend the majority of question on her first hear. However, she misheard some of the questions which meant that her answer did not match the question and sometimes she would miss out possessive pronouns.

Shahin Shahriyari

Shahin was able to name a lot of useful information and she especially gave a lot of at the start when she could speaker more freely about herself. Having said this, there were some issues in her answers as she often listed ideas rather than joining them together with linkers. Also, she missed out certain verbs, for example ‘I want teacher’, and she made a few pronunciation errors.

Sahar Haghighat

Sahar spoke clearly at an excellent pace and rarely struggled with understanding the questions. Also, she gave full responses and only needed to be prompted once for more detail. She should work on using synonyms more because she would often say the same verb rather than replacing it with a different one.

Zahra Rezaei

Zahra was a confident speaker and gave an in-depth description of her life. Having said this, she missed out pronouns and articles in her answers and she often had difficulties with understanding the questions which resulted in incorrect replies.

Shahrzad Rasekh

Shahrzad was a clear speaker and could understand more complex structures. Furthermore, she used a lot of useful vocabulary and did not need to be assisted with any questions which resulted in an interview which flowed well. She sometimes repeated the same verbs, so should work on using phrasal verbs more as this will only enhance her English speaking ability.

Saharnaz Sepehr

Saharnaz gave extremely detailed responses and used appropriate phrases to begin them. Also, she could use excellent examples to support her ideas and did not need prompting. There were just one or two issues, one being that she used the adjective form instead of the noun form, for example, ‘I would like to go to american’.

Mandana Rasekh

Mandana had very good pronunciation and used suitable vocabulary. Also, she used descriptive language well because she described her old teacher well. She should be careful with some of his choice of words because, at times, he confused certain words, like ’25 years ago’ instead of ‘old’ and ‘he learned me a lot of things’. Also, he should pay extra attention to frequency adverbs as these were placed at the end of a sentence.

Shahrokh Shojaei

Shahrokh came across as a confident speaker and he could give much fuller responses than expected. He also used a wide range of vocabulary and phrases, and if he was unsure of a meaning, he would double check it before answering, as he did with ‘spare time’. However, he tended to say ‘erm’ quite a bit throughout his interview, so he should try to reduce this in the future.

Bahareh Masoudi

Bahareh spoke at a good pace and was able to reproduce the correct pronunciation of words. She did however, struggle with a lot of the questions as she gave an incorrect reply  so she should work on her listening more. Also, Bahareh needs to concentrate on the order of words because this again let her down. One example of this is, ‘I visit at weekend once a week’.

Somayeh Foroghiniya

Although Somayeh gave a brief introduction, she was able to use simple sentences well. Also, she used appropriate language in her answers, but she had to be asked further questions in order to gain more information. Furthermore, Somayeh should be careful when forming the verb to be as she often got these mixed up.

BahmanRohani Bahman spoke at a reasonable speed and stressed words correctly. He also used comparative adjectives and the past tense correctly. Having said this, Bahman needs to focus more on how to extend his replies, as he always had to be prompted to gain additional information, and he should be careful with his verbs that are followed by ‘to’.

Khobchehr Asadi

Khobchehr used some useful vocabulary in her answers, especially weather vocabulary, and used descriptive language well. Also, she accurately used adverbs and began her responses with suitable expressions. On the other hand, Khobchehr needs to work on her grammar more because there were several occasions when the wrong tense was applied, such as, ‘I study in Fakher now’, also, she tended to place the adjective after the noun.

ParisaEslamlo

Parisa gave a detailed description about her family and used good phrase to express her liking for something, e.g. ‘I’m crazy about…’. Though she needed a great deal of questions repeated or rephrased and at one point replied in Persian, so she should work on her listening for next time.

Kaveh Eslamlo

Kaveh was a polite candidate who was able to self correct and form sentences well with all the words in the correct order. However, he often had to be prompted to gain further knowledge and he struggled with the present perfect tense.

Marziyeh Shahani

Marziyeh was able to talk in the present tense well and made some valid points in her answers. Although she had some good ideas, she generally listed them instead of linking them together with connectors. Also, Marziyeh should work on her listening further because she often misunderstood questions and this resulted in an irrelevant answer being given.

Sara Mohamadi

Sara gave an excellent introduction on her background and has an excellent awareness of her pronunciation because if she pronounced a word incorrectly, she swiftly corrected it. She needs to work on her prepositions as she would leave these o, such as, ‘When I was high school …’. Also at times, Sara gave quite brief replies, so she should ways to extend them.

Mostafa Golchin

Mostafa pronounced words well and he demonstrated a good understanding of present simple questions. Having said this, he needs to work on extending his answer much more because he regularly answered with yes/no short answers. This made it much harder to assess and he did not use a wide range of vocabulary. Also, when he was asked slightly harder questions, he would reply with a completely different answer so he should work at enhancing his listening skills.

Ehsan Mansorabadi

Ehsan could form sentences with third person verbs in it correctly throughout and he used good descriptive language when talking about his family. He made some word order errors, one being, ‘my teacher favourite Mr W… at school’; and tended to miss articles with singular nouns.

Maryam Farhad

Maryam could form simple sentences and was able to use the present tense well. Also, she could support her replies with personal examples. There were a lot of occasions when she did not understand the questions fully as she often responded with an irrelevant answer. Furthermore, she was not unable to use the past tense when she really should have. Having said this, there were a few issues with the connection and this may have affected the quality of her speaking.

Laila Safari

Laila was able to self correct herself on numerous instances and she had some good ideas. Also, she demonstrated a good range of vocabulary, but she could not use many words in the correct form. I would advise Laila to try and work on her word order as these were a major problem too e.g.  ‘I very like this much’.

Negin Azizi

Negin gave a detailed introduction and had good intonation. In addition, she could comprehend the majority of question on her first hear. However, she misheard some of the questions which meant that her answer did not match the question and sometimes she would miss out possessive pronouns.

Shahin Shahriyari

Shahin was able to name a lot of useful information and she especially gave a lot of at the start when she could speaker more freely about herself. Having said this, there were some issues in her answers as she often listed ideas rather than joining them together with linkers. Also, she missed out certain verbs, for example ‘I want teacher’, and she made a few pronunciation errors.

Sahar Haghighat

Sahar spoke clearly at an excellent pace and rarely struggled with understanding the questions. Also, she gave full responses and only needed to be prompted once for more detail. She should work on using synonyms more because she would often say the same verb rather than replacing it with a different one.

Zahra Rezaei

Zahra was a confident speaker and gave an in-depth description of her life. Having said this, she missed out pronouns and articles in her answers and she often had difficulties with understanding the questions which resulted in incorrect replies.

Shahrzad Rasekh

Shahrzad was a clear speaker and could understand more complex structures. Furthermore, she used a lot of useful vocabulary and did not need to be assisted with any questions which resulted in an interview which flowed well. She sometimes repeated the same verbs, so should work on using phrasal verbs more as this will only enhance her English speaking ability.

Saharnaz Sepehr

Saharnaz gave extremely detailed responses and used appropriate phrases to begin them. Also, she could use excellent examples to support her ideas and did not need prompting. There were just one or two issues, one being that she used the adjective form instead of the noun form, for example, ‘I would like to go to american’.

Mandana Rasekh

Mandana had very good pronunciation and used suitable vocabulary. Also, she used descriptive language well because she described her old teacher well. She should be careful with some of his choice of words because, at times, he confused certain words, like ’25 years ago’ instead of ‘old’ and ‘he learned me a lot of things’. Also, he should pay extra attention to frequency adverbs as these were placed at the end of a sentence.

Shahrokh Shojaei

Shahrokh came across as a confident speaker and he could give much fuller responses than expected. He also used a wide range of vocabulary and phrases, and if he was unsure of a meaning, he would double check it before answering, as he did with ‘spare time’. However, he tended to say ‘erm’ quite a bit throughout his interview, so he should try to reduce this in the future.

Bahareh Masoudi

Bahareh spoke at a good pace and was able to reproduce the correct pronunciation of words. She did however, struggle with a lot of the questions as she gave an incorrect reply  so she should work on her listening more. Also, Bahareh needs to concentrate on the order of words because this again let her down. One example of this is, ‘I visit at weekend once a week’.

Somayeh Foroghiniya

Although Somayeh gave a brief introduction, she was able to use simple sentences well. Also, she used appropriate language in her answers, but she had to be asked further questions in order to gain more information. Furthermore, Somayeh should be careful when forming the verb to be as she often got these mixed up.

BahmanRohani Bahman spoke at a reasonable speed and stressed words correctly. He also used comparative adjectives and the past tense correctly. Having said this, Bahman needs to focus more on how to extend his replies, as he always had to be prompted to gain additional information, and he should be careful with his verbs that are followed by ‘to’.

Khobchehr Asadi

Khobchehr used some useful vocabulary in her answers, especially weather vocabulary, and used descriptive language well. Also, she accurately used adverbs and began her responses with suitable expressions. On the other hand, Khobchehr needs to work on her grammar more because there were several occasions when the wrong tense was applied, such as, ‘I study in Fakher now’, also, she tended to place the adjective after the noun.

ParisaEslamlo

Parisa gave a detailed description about her family and used good phrase to express her liking for something, e.g. ‘I’m crazy about…’. Though she needed a great deal of questions repeated or rephrased and at one point replied in Persian, so she should work on her listening for next time.

Kaveh Eslamlo

Kaveh was a polite candidate who was able to self correct and form sentences well with all the words in the correct order. However, he often had to be prompted to gain further knowledge and he struggled with the present perfect tense.

Marziyeh Shahani

Marziyeh was able to talk in the present tense well and made some valid points in her answers. Although she had some good ideas, she generally listed them instead of linking them together with connectors. Also, Marziyeh should work on her listening further because she often misunderstood questions and this resulted in an irrelevant answer being given.

Sara Mohamadi

Sara gave an excellent introduction on her background and has an excellent awareness of her pronunciation because if she pronounced a word incorrectly, she swiftly corrected it. She needs to work on her prepositions as she would leave these o, such as, ‘When I was high school …’. Also at times, Sara gave quite brief replies, so she should ways to extend them.

Mostafa Golchin

Mostafa pronounced words well and he demonstrated a good understanding of present simple questions. Having said this, he needs to work on extending his answer much more because he regularly answered with yes/no short answers. This made it much harder to assess and he did not use a wide range of vocabulary. Also, when he was asked slightly harder questions, he would reply with a completely different answer so he should work at enhancing his listening skills.

Ehsan Mansorabadi

Ehsan could form sentences with third person verbs in it correctly throughout and he used good descriptive language when talking about his family. He made some word order errors, one being, ‘my teacher favourite Mr W… at school’; and tended to miss articles with singular nouns.