موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد فاخر

Marziyeh ShirOjan

Marziyeh could understand the questions well and had some excellent response. Also, she used pronouns well and tried to answer in full sentences. Although she gave some good responses, she often confused the verb form with the noun form, for example, ‘the best celebrate’ instead of ‘the best celebration’. Also, she made some mistakes when choosing appropriate verbs e.g. ‘we get a big party’.

Negar Mohamadi

Negar used some excellent phrases and gave a detailed definition of etiquette using examples to support her answer. Also, she was easy to follow because of her speaking pace and could talk about both sides of an argument. She needs to work on her prepositions as she often used an incorrect one, for example, ‘in the first time’.

Soror Amiritavasoli

Soror gave an insightful introduction and used suitable language which was always directly relevant to the question. She made some pronunciation errors e.g. ‘throw’ and sometimes used a noun instead of an adjective. Furthermore, she should try to use opening phrases more to begin her answers.

Nilofar Ronama

Nilofar had good oral skils as she was able to use intonation and stress correctly. Also, she was able to expand her responses with ease and used adverbs well. However, she made some grammar errors, in particular, third person verb forms, and she mispronounced a few words, like, ‘sew’.

Mohamad HadiAzari

Mohamad used conditionals well and gave an excellent response to a question on ‘etiquette’. He also used pronouns well used quite advanced vocabulary. He should try to use more synonyms and work on comparative forms as he said ‘more safe and more fun’.

Mohamad Mehdi Samimi

Mohamad gave a detailed description of his family and could also give full answers to all of the questions. Also, he used the past tense well appropriately and used opening expressions. He had a few problems with prepositions and made a couple of mistakes with plural irregular nouns, such as , ‘young persons’ instead of ‘people’.

Saha Badiei

Saha used brilliant expression to open her answers and she demonstrated an in-depth understanding of the English language as she used quite advanced words. Furthermore, she always gave full response, with personal examples, and she did not need to be prompted. She should try to use more idiomatic language and watch her pronunciation as she regularly pronounced ‘behaviour’ incorrectly.

Ahmad Tavanaei

Ahmad gave a good introduction and spoke clearly at a steady speed. He did, however, give quite short replies and this resulted in him being asked additional questions. Also, he often confused the noun form with the adjective, for example, he said ‘to drink alcoholic’ rather than ‘to drink alcohol’.

Hamid Reza Bayat

Hamid used a wide range of vocabulary and used personal examples to support his answers. Also, he used adverbs and superlatives accurately. Having said this, he should try to use opening phrases and be careful with his tenses because he tended to answer in the present tense when the past tense should have been used.

Mohamad Tajali

Mohamad gave full responses and did not need additional questions to gain more information. Also, he used phrasal verbs well and he could use appropriate language, such as ‘newlyweds’. He should be careful with his word order as there were some issues with this, and also his pronunciation as he made a couple of errors here too e.g. ‘suit’.

Shiva Roshanghiyas

Shiva was able to used comparative language easily and could talk a lot on various cultures. Furthermore, she gave a lot of detail and used her lexis well, especially when answering a question which related to medicine. There were one or two issues when it came to using the most appropriate verb, as she said ‘to eat alcoholic drinks’; and she made a couple of third person mistakes.

Shahnaz Habibi

Shahnazgave an in-depth introduction and could form complex structures well using adequate vocabulary to do so. She had a couple of problems with third person verb forms and also nouns in their plural form as she would often say the singular form instead, such as, ‘woman’ instead of ‘women’.

Maryam NorAli

Maryam was a very open candidate who used expressions well, such as, ‘ I think I am an honest person’. Furthermore, she was able to use personal examples to support her ideas. She should work on prepositions more as she said, ‘I am good in driving’, and sometimes she would use a verb when it should have been a noun.

Reza Zarei

Reza spoke at an excellent pace and he could form sentences without any difficulties. In addition, he could comprehend all questions, used sophisticated expressions, such as, ‘it depends on my situation’, and he always responded without having to think. He had a couple of pronunciation issues, like ‘clothes’, and once or twice used a singular verb instead of a plural one.

Mohamad Mehdi

Mohamad used a great deal of personal examples to support his ideas and also used appropriate words in his replies. Having said this, he often gave quite short responses and this meant he had to be asked more to gain extra details. Also, he made a couple of prepositional errors and he paused once or twice to think of a word. If he cannot think of the word, he should try to describe it instead.

Maryam Norozi

Maryam used a variety of tenses and could self correct herself well, especially if she made a mistake with the verb form or pronounced a word incorrectly. Also, she had good descriptive skills and used adverbs well. She should work on her listening more because she had to have a few questions repeated and she ought to use a variety of linkers as she used ‘and’ quite a lot when adding additional information.

BaharehSharifi

Baharehshowed that he could use a variety of words in her answers which fitted well with the questions. Also, she used emphasising words well and had confidence in what he was saying. She needs to work a little more on his vocabulary as he confused cultural literacy with etiquette, and she made some errors with third person verb forms, such as using ‘have’ instead of ‘has’.

ParvinTaghavimoghadam

Parvin spoke at a steady speed and always corrected her pronunciation errors immediately. Also, she was able to understand the majority of questions effortlessly and spoke in complete sentences rather than just listing her ideas. However, she had a couple of difficulties with using the correct type of word, such as, ‘they signature many books’; and she tended to leave off the ‘s’ at the end of plural nouns.