موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد فاخر

Level 8

Peyman Hekmat

Peyman used excellent vocabulary throughout, such as, ‘catastrophic’, and he used opening present well. Furthermore, he had good pronunciation skills and used personal examples to support his ideas. There were a couple of grammatical errors, such as I’m agree’ and he missed the ‘s’ off some plural nouns.

Ali Pakro

Ali gave a detailed description of his of his background and he used modals well. Furthermore, he used a variety of structures, such as conditionals and he was able to use figures to support his opinions. He had a couple of errors with his pronunciation as he wold often use rising intonation in sentences when he should not have.

Zahra Tavakoli

Zahra used excellent phrases and could speak in a variety of tenses easily. Furthermore, she used suitable vocabulary and could speak at length for all questions. Having said this, she sometimes repeated the same point she had already made, so she should pay extra attention to what she previously said. Also, she misheard ‘tourism’ for ‘terrorism’.

Mohamad Tavakoli

Mohamad used a wide range of vocabulary and gave a very detailed answer for a question on military service. Also, he was able to form grammatically correct sentences, but he used the wrong tense for a few of the questions, such as, ‘I never do it’ instead of ‘I’ve never done it’.

Mohamad Reza Mola

Mohamad used had a good grasp of English grammar as he used conditional structures well and could use various tenses appropriately.However, he often gave quite short responses, so he should work on expanding them without being asked more questions, also, he missed articles off some nouns, like ‘we saw waterfall’.

Pegah Yosefi

Pegah could talk at length on her personal information and she used an array of vocabulary for each question. Also, she pronounced words correctly and used opening expressions well. However, when she used the passive voice, she often missed out the auxiliary verb, such as, ‘many people killed’. Also, she should work on her word order a more as there were some errors with this too.

Nilofar Roshan

Nilofar had excellent pronunciation skills and was able to form simple sentences well. She should work on her listening a lot more because she had to have her questions repeated numerous times and she should work on expanding her answers because sometimes they were a little too short.

Granos Bahmani

Granos used an excellent variety of words which suited each question perfectly, such as, ‘Richter scale’. Also, she could talk in the passive voice correctly and used synonyms to avoid repetition of certain words. However, she ought to be careful of verbs in the past tense as once or twice she used the bare infinitive form instead of the past simple.

Mahbobeh Ahmadi

Mahbobeh used good phrases and was able to support his answers with examples. Furthermore, he used a wide range of vocabulary, although he tended to use a word in its wrong form which resulted in slight errors within his sentences e.g. ‘they can tolerance it’. Also, he made a couple of mistakes with the pronunciation of words, so he should work on this area further.

Meysam Afshar

Meysam was a clear and confident speaker who demonstrated good oral skills as she had excellent intonation and stress. Also, she used sequencers well and used a variety of suitable language. She should work on her prepositions as she used the wrong one a few times and she often used the verb to be in its wrong form, such as, ‘he be familiar to it’.

Zohre Afshin

Zohre used excellent opening phrases, like ‘I absolutely agree’. Also, she formed sentences well and had good listening skills as she was able to comprehend and answer all of the questions. She needs to work on her grammar more as she often missed ‘s’ off plural countable nouns, and she should work on extending her answer because once or twice she gave quite a short reply.

Maryam  Mola

Maryam had excellent listening skills as she could understand quite complex questions easily enough and she responded immediately without thinking. Furthermore, she self-corrected herself and used examples to support her opinion. She now needs to focus more on her grammar because she used an incorrect verb in some sentences, for example, ‘the book had written by…’, or she used an incorrect preposition.

Ali  Nezami

Ali gave a detailed description at the start and he used opening expressions well. Also, he spoke in complete sentences and spoke clearly. At times, he gave short replies so he had to be asked additional ‘why’ to gain a greater understanding. Furthermore, he missed ‘s’ off plural nouns and used prepositions incorrectly, such as, ‘it is famous of natural beauty’.

Hosein Emani

Hosein used simple sentence structures well in his answers and used examples in them. He should work on expanding his replies and also he needs to expand his vocabulary further because he struggled to understand the broader questions. Also, he had a couple of issues with his tenses as he would use an auxiliary verb in present simple sentences.

Vahid Tabashir

Vahid spoke at a steady pace, used appropriate vocabulary and had excellent ideas in his answers. Having said this, he struggled to give a fuller response so he should work on ways to expand his ideas further, such as using personal examples or giving a reason for why you believe in something.

Eman Dehghani

Eman had good listening skills because he was able to comprehend all of the questions and he did not need any of them repeating. However, he needs to work on his grammar much more because he missed out auxiliary and main verbs in his sentences, used the wrong tense and had a bit of trouble with the order of words.

Level 6

Rasoul Rezaie

Rasoul had an excellent accent and he could self correct automatically. Furthermore, he used conditional structures well and demonstrated a good understand of English words. He needs to be careful with prepositional patterns as he tended to use the bare infinitive instead of a gerund. Also, he missed out articles, so he should work on this area too.

Hangameh Mehran

 Hangameh used comparative language correctly and could join her ideas together well using appropriate linkers. However, she needs to work on her listening more because she struggled to comprehend some of the questions and had to have them repeated or rephrases, also, she omitted modals of ability at times.

Ehsan Salehi

Ehsanhad good listening skills and he used a variety of phrasal verbs in his responses. Also, he spoke at a good pace and used comparative language appropriately. However, he often used a wrong preposition, such as, ‘for save…’ and there were a couple of errors in her pronunciation, like, ‘ow’ in ‘owner’.

Reza  Rozitalab

Although Reza gave a brief introduction, he was able to speak in complete sentences. In addition, he demonstrated a wide range of vocabulary as he used idiomatic language and phrasal verbs well, such as, ‘down in the dumps’. He should work on his prepositions as some were used incorrectly and he made a couple of negative structure mistakes, like, ‘I try don’t touch it’.

Esmail Akbari

Esmail used good phrases to begin his responses. Also, he gave detailed answers and used personal examples to support his ideas. He should focus on his grammar more because he did not use gerunds when he should have and he made some errors with the verb to be, such as, ‘she are housewife’.