Fatemesafari
Fateme had good pronunciation and listening skills, she was able to use various expressions and adverbs to begin her replies. She could use modal verbs accurately and used appropriate vocabulary. She ought to watch a few grammar points as when she was speaking in the past, she used a couple of present simple verbs and could not use the passive voice correctly. Also, she needs to use more pronouns to avoid repetition of nouns.
Salarjayervandi
Salar used a good range of adjectives and was able to use suitable lexis in his answers. He spoke at a steady pace and could comprehend the majority of his questions after a couple of repetitions. He should work on expanding his answers more because they often fell a little short or would list ideas, rather than using complete sentences. Furthermore, he made a couple of pronunciation errors as with ‘spectator’ and sometimes his ideas would not always follow in a logical order.
Ali akbarparvizi
Ali had good comprehension and used a lot of opinionative phrases. He spoke in full sentences and gave detailed answers, varying his modals. However, he should be careful with them, because when he would use a question word in his sentence, he would change the word order as it would be in a questions e.g. ‘…what should we know’. In addition, he should try to reduce the amount of times he used nouns and instead replace them with a pronoun to up his fluency.
Aminabbasi
Amin was able to understand and answer third conditional structures. He used a good amount of vocabulary which suited each of his questions and had good listening. Having said this, he tended to give very brief responses and would tended to use key lexis, but without much depth to his answers. Also, he made a few mistakes with correct adjective choice as he said ‘economic ways’ not ‘economical’.
Zohrealipoor
Zohre was had good listening, was very descriptive and could give a balanced argument. She was able to use various structures correctly, such as, ‘passive voice and conditionals’ and used examples to support her ideas. She should work on her pronunciation slightly as she would tend to use a rising intonation in her answers. Furthermore, she would miss off an ‘s’ for third person verbs and plural nouns, for instance ‘he write’ or ‘his book’.
Nateghabbasizade
Nategh demonstrated a good understanding of English grammar as he could use the passive voice correctly and used modals of obligation accurately. He used full sentences, but needs to develop more of his answers more because, for example when he was asked about young people’s book preference, he name a few types of books, but could have said why he thought that. Also, he should focus on his listening more because he had to have them repeated several times, and made some word form errors.
Zohremesbah
Zohre could start her questions well by varying her opening expressions. She was able to expand her answers brilliantly, using examples accurately, and spoke at a natural pace with very good pronunciation and range of vocabulary. She should watch her conditional structures, as she used more than one infinitive after her modal verbs. Also, she used singular indefinite pronoun with plural nouns, for example ‘another people’.
Kheyronesaafrasyabi
Kheyronesa used opinionative language well and could use third conditional correctly. She used a few modal verbs like ‘can’ fittingly and seemed to be able to comprehend the majority of her questions easily enough, especially when they were on personal experience or interest. Having said this, she struggled to answers questions which required a broader response and her answers ought to be much more detailed.
Alinekooiefard
Ali gave detailed answers throughout and used good examples to demonstrate his point of view. He spoke at a steady pace, used accurate tenses in his answers and had good listening skills. He should work on his verb to ‘be’ usage because he would either miss it out or use it incorrectly, for instance when making a present simple passive statement he missed it ‘this delivered’. Also, he missed out articles or used definite when one was not needed.
Aidaomidvari
Aida used a range of modal verbs accurately and had good pronunciation because she had good stress and intonation. She also used suitable vocabulary, including phrasal verbs and varied her adjectives. She should watch her listening though because she misheard ‘tourism’ for ‘terrorism’, which resulted in an inappropriate answers being given. Furthermore, she could expand with more of her answer as a few could have been expanded.
Marjanmoayeri
Marjan was able to use recent examples to support her answers and used a wide range of advanced language, including phrasal verbs and advanced lexis. She could paraphrase and used argumentative expressions well. However, she missed out an ‘s’ off some plural nouns and made a few mistakes with pronouns, but nothing major.
Maryamrahimian
Maryam spoke at a steady pace and used present simple verbs correctly in her detailed answers. She was able to comprehend many of her questions well and used appropriate vocabulary like ‘perishable’. Having said this, she did mispronounce a few words and when she was giving her responses, some of them were difficult to follow, so she should work on her structure of ideas.
Maryamjeddi
Maryam used opening phrases well and could answer using a wide range of vocabulary like ‘death toll’. She used conjunctions accurately and generally gave in-depth replies. She should work on her word form as she used a verb when the adjective form was needed, such as ‘can be attract’ not ‘attractive’. Also, she misused some prepositions and missed out an article on a few occasions.
Masoomerafiee
Masoome used opinionative language well, supported her answers with personal examples and used modal verbs accurately. She also used indefinite pronouns well, for example ‘I like to read both’. She should watch her verb patterns because she would use infinitive with verbs to describe ‘likes/dislikes’ and should try to use more complex structures.
Delbarajdari
Delbar gave detailed answers throughout and could expand them using accurate examples and lexis. She was able to give a balanced argument and used pronouns well. She should watch her prepositions as she made several mistakes with ‘to’ and used incorrect word forms, for example ‘it will addict’ instead of using the adjective equivalent with the verb to be.
RazieAlamdar
Razie used full sentences and could use opening expressions well. She could expand her ideas by supporting them with examples and comprehended her questions easily. She should watch her past simple verbs when using that tense as she made a couple of slip ups by saying a present form instead. Also, she had a few issues with word order and intonation too.
Ehsanmohajerani
Ehsan was able to use opening phrases like ‘I think’ and used a variety instead of repeating the same one. He had no difficulties with using examples and had good listening skills. He should work on pronunciation a little as he used incorrect stress a few times. Also, he needs to work on developing his answers more and be careful with his word form as he said, ‘has beneficial’ and ‘earthquake, flooding, volcanic…’.
Farideizadi
Faride was able to give a balanced argument and used expressions correctly. She used adverbial phrases well, could speak in various tenses easily using the right verb pattern and comprehended her questions. She should work on her negative adjectives as she missed out the prefix to give correct meaning and mispronounced words, especially when they had a ‘v’ in it as she would say it with a ‘w’ sound e.g. ‘inwite’ for ‘invite’.
Taheremoghtaderi
Tahere used linking words correctly and used suitable lexis for each of her answers. She spoke at a steady pace and used full sentences. She should work on her listening more as she had to have her questions repeated on several occasions or she would mishear a word and this resulted in an inaccurate answer. As what happened when she was asked her favourite ‘author’ because she responded with a reply on ‘art’. Also, she missed out the ‘s’ in third person sentences.
Tahereziaee
Tahere could use appropriate expressions and varied them to open her answers, such as ‘I think..’ or ‘in my opinion…’. She used strong adjectives well and used full sentences and could comprehend her questions. Having said this, she did struggle to respond using third conditional structures and ought to give a little more detail in her answers too.
Leilanamazi
Leila demonstrated good listening and comprehension and was able to use comparative adjectives well. She used correct verb patterns and gave detailed responses. Having said this, her sentences were often disjointed and would not be completely grammatically accurate. So she should focus on her sentence structure more, also, she would miss out pronouns at times and made a couple of mistakes with verb choice as she said ‘invite’ instead of ‘invent’.
Sadeghzarmehi
Sadegh spoke at a steady pace, gave in-depth answers and used linking words appropriately. He was able to express his opinion well by using fitting examples and phrases and he could speak in various tenses with ease. He made a couple of errors with negative prefixes because he said, ‘unactive’ and he sometimes missed out an ‘s’ with plural nouns.
Faridejahanbazi
Faride was able to understand her questions well and gave good descriptions for natural places of beauty. She used full complete sentences, used adjectives in various forms correctly and spoke clearly. Having said this, she struggled to give a lot of details in her answers as she would start off confidently, but after a few sentences, would either give up or run out of ideas for each question. So she should work on using more examples to expand better. Also, she tended to follow prepositions with ‘to’ instead of a gerund, such as, ‘without waste time’.